World of CokeInformation About Coke
|
Coke in the
news:
DEC finds `no public health concerns' RE Tonawanda
Coke shutdown Tonawanda Coke https://buffalonews.com/2018/11/18/you-asked-we-answered-who-pays-to-clean-up-tonawanda-coke/ $5.5 million released to study how Tonawanda Coke’s poisons affected neighbors.After more than two years of waiting, advocates of a public health study into Tonawanda Coke’s manufacturing operations got more than a simple approval last week. Buffalo News, New York. India biggest importer of US oil refinery byproduct the bottom-of-the-barrel leftover from refining Canadian tar sands crude and other heavy oils, is cheaper and burns hotter than coal. But it also contains more planet-warming carbon and far more heart- and lung-damaging sulfur. India to ban imports of petcoke as concerns about air pollution grow The Indian government will phase out imports of petroleum coke, or petcoke, though the use of petcoke within the country continues to be debated. An AP report found US oil refineries are exporting the product to India in huge amounts, unable to unload it at home. Tonawanda Coke cleanup worries neighbors.Neighbors near Tonawanda Coke are worried about their health. DEC proposes 'expedited cleanup' at part of Tonawanda Coke site.Coke plant cleanup efforts continue. cooperating with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency order to monitor and analyze soil and groundwater at the former Ashland Coke Plant Petcoke operator out of Chicago Koch brothers' firm threatens lawsuit over Chicago petcoke rules Criminal Charges CokeCoal-burning NY coke plant fined $12.5M for Clean Air Act violations; manager gets jail, fineSoil testing results for neighbors of Tonawanda Coke. Sentencing day could come with prison time for Tonawanda Coke’s environmental control manager and millions of dollars in fines for the company for violating the Clean Air Act. Buffalo WIVB, New York. 4 March 2014. Toxic chemicals found in soil of homes near Tonawanda Coke plant. Air monitoring showing elevated levels of benzene and other toxic emissions in the Town of Tonawanda’s western industrial corridor has been well-documented. Now a local citizens group is studying whether that pollution has also infiltrated the soil in nearby neighborhoods. Buffalo News, New York. 4 March 2014.
Petroleum Coke is a big issue in Illinois. But not an emergency. T his summer 2013, residents of Chicago’s far southeast side noticed mountains of black dust growing in one corner of the neighborhood. It’s petroleum coke -- pet coke for short. That's what gasoline refineries produce as a byproduct of refining gasoline. It’s full of carbon, sulphur and heavy metals. MarketPlace
In a complaint filed Monday in Cook County Illinois, Circuit Court, Madigan accused KCBX Terminals of repeatedly violating state law by allowing lung-damaging particulate matter to swirl off piles of petroleum coke and coal along the Calumet River. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-petcoke-madigan-lawsuit-20131105,0,6192697.story Petroleum coke from BP oil refinery piles up in Chicago. Just south of the Chicago Skyway bridge, a dusty byproduct of the Canadian oil boom is piling up in huge black mountains along the Calumet River. More is on the way. A lot more. Chicago Tribune, Illinois Illinois EPA cracks down on owner of petcoke pile on Southeast Side. Faced with complaints about black clouds of dust swirling into two Chicago neighborhoods, state environmental regulators are cracking down on one of the companies piling up huge mounds of refinery waste on the Southeast Side. Chicago Tribune, Illinois Push on for petroleum coke study before Keystone pipeline gets OK. A U.S. congressman is calling for a complete health review of petroleum coke before Washington approves the Keystone XL Pipeline. Michigan Representative Gary Peters claims that one third of the cheap, combustible carbon byproduct, used mainly in overseas power plants, comes from the Alberta oilsands. CBC Canada. 30 May 2013. Carondelet Coke was one of the most polluted places in Missouri. Allied Chemical and Ironton Coke was one of the most contaminated sites in Ohio. Each scored high enough on a hazard scale to be considered for inclusion on the U.S. government's priority list for cleaning toxic sites. See: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/missouri-avoided-superfund-taxpayers-get-the-bill/article_9afc5a5c-a79e-5e96-b53a-d8beddd47f4e.htmlBy-products and wastes generated by the gasification process included polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and other contaminants and hazardous substances including benzene, arsenic, heavy metals, tar, oil, coal, lampblack, and coke. http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/dec2011/2011-12-13-091.html The largest company still operating there is Walter Coke, which is being sued in a class-action lawsuit by a North Birmingham resident on behalf of area property owners. Walter Coke processes coal to produce coke for fuel use in blast furnaces and foundries in the steel industry. http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2011/07/toxic_substances_found_in_soil.html Aug. 27 -- The Tonawanda Coke Corp., of Tonawanda, N.Y., faces another round of environmental orders from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has now accused the company of violating its Clean Water Act permit...MORE»
EPA cites coke plant for cyanide violations. Tonawanda Coke is in hot water with the Environmental Protection Agency again. Buffalo News, New York. 27 August 2010.
Erie Coke plant casts a long, unhealthy shadow
Buffalo News - - Jun
19, 2010
Owner of Erie Coke plant pays environmental fines
Buffalo News - - Jun
18, 2010
Tonawanda Coke Corp. faces more EPA orders April 30 -- The Tonawanda Coke Corp. in Tonawanda, N.Y., is facing yet another set of orders from the U.S. Environmental Protection... MORE»Manager arrested, company cited for enviro violations Jan. 29 2010-- An environmental manager for Tonawanda Coke Corp. has been arrested and several environmental allegations have been made against the company following a lengthy investigation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Link here: http://www.wasterecyclingnews.com/headlines2.html?id=1264777367&allowcomm=true Council asks Tonawanda Coke to be better neighbor. The City of Tonawanda Common Council is asking nearby chemical facilities to be better neighbors by reducing the amount of a carcinogenic chemical that they release into the air, potentially putting city residents’ health at risk. North Tonawanda News, New York. 7 January 2009. Monroe spends $150,000 and counting to halt coke plant. The city says the coke plant would emit thousands of tons per year of new pollutants into the air of Butler County, which does not meet federal air quality standards designed to protect public health. Middletown Journal, Ohio. 25 February 2009. Ohio EPA: It's OK to start building $340M coke plant. SunCoke Energy has the go-ahead to start construction on its $340 million coke oven facility in Middletown. Middletown Journal, Ohio. 22 January 2009. See also: Proposed coke plant raises concerns for neighboring communitiesBy Duane Ramsey
November
2007--Sandy Bihn doesn't know her possible new neighbors, but she's leery
about what their presence in her community could mean. Click for full story: http://www.toledofreepress.com/?id=6796 New Coke Plant Controversy: Cocaine "coke" is also a well known slang term for cocaine. For further information about cocaine search with Google, AllTheWeb, Lycos, or other Web search sites. For other definitions please also see The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language |
Big Steel | |
Coke oven pictures |
Mountains of Fire |
Coke fire |
Homestead Strike & Lockout of 1892 |
Cokemaking and Coke Resource |
Fueling a Revolution |
Technical detail on coke |
Thunder of Protest |
More technical detail on coke |
Making coke can be a dirty process: an Illinois petroleum coke maker was cited for air violations In July 2005 a coke drying plant near Chicago, Illinois was facing government action regarding alleged air pollution violations at Lemont, Ill. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency alleges that the company modified the plant, causing significant emission increases, without obtaining permits that would have required the installation of additional pollution controls. The company also allegedly failed to report the modifications in its state operating permit application and failed to comply with testing and monitoring requirements, the EPA said. The emissions that allegedly increased included volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. Source: WasteNews.com |
|