
World of CokeInformation About Coke
|
| Coke in the
news:
By-products and wastes generated by the gasification process included polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, and other contaminants and hazardous substances including benzene, arsenic, heavy metals, tar, oil, coal, lampblack, and coke. http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/dec2011/2011-12-13-091.html The largest company still operating there is Walter Coke, which is being sued in a class-action lawsuit by a North Birmingham resident on behalf of area property owners. Walter Coke processes coal to produce coke for fuel use in blast furnaces and foundries in the steel industry. http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2011/07/toxic_substances_found_in_soil.html Aug. 27 -- The Tonawanda Coke Corp., of Tonawanda, N.Y., faces another round of environmental orders from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA has now accused the company of violating its Clean Water Act permit...MORE»
EPA cites coke plant for cyanide violations. Tonawanda Coke is in hot water with the Environmental Protection Agency again. Buffalo News, New York. 27 August 2010.
Erie Coke plant casts a long, unhealthy shadow
Buffalo News - - Jun
19, 2010
Owner of Erie Coke plant pays environmental fines
Buffalo News - - Jun
18, 2010
Tonawanda Coke Corp. faces more EPA orders April 30 -- The Tonawanda Coke Corp. in Tonawanda, N.Y., is facing yet another set of orders from the U.S. Environmental Protection... MORE»Manager arrested, company cited for enviro violations Jan. 29 2010-- An environmental manager for Tonawanda Coke Corp. has been arrested and several environmental allegations have been made against the company following a lengthy investigation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Link here: http://www.wasterecyclingnews.com/headlines2.html?id=1264777367&allowcomm=true Council asks Tonawanda Coke to be better neighbor. The City of Tonawanda Common Council is asking nearby chemical facilities to be better neighbors by reducing the amount of a carcinogenic chemical that they release into the air, potentially putting city residents’ health at risk. North Tonawanda News, New York. 7 January 2009. Monroe spends $150,000 and counting to halt coke plant. The city says the coke plant would emit thousands of tons per year of new pollutants into the air of Butler County, which does not meet federal air quality standards designed to protect public health. Middletown Journal, Ohio. 25 February 2009. Ohio EPA: It's OK to start building $340M coke plant. SunCoke Energy has the go-ahead to start construction on its $340 million coke oven facility in Middletown. Middletown Journal, Ohio. 22 January 2009. See also: Proposed coke plant raises concerns for neighboring communitiesBy Duane Ramsey
November
2007--Sandy Bihn doesn't know her possible new neighbors, but she's leery
about what their presence in her community could mean. Click for full story: http://www.toledofreepress.com/?id=6796 New Coke Plant Controversy: Cocaine "coke" is also a well known slang term for cocaine. For further information about cocaine search with Google, AllTheWeb, Lycos, or other Web search sites. For other definitions please also see The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language |
Big
Steel
| |
Coke oven pictures |
Mountains of Fire |
Coke fire |
Homestead Strike & Lockout of 1892 |
Cokemaking and Coke Resource |
Fueling a Revolution |
Technical detail on coke |
Thunder of Protest |
More technical detail on coke |
Making coke can be a dirty process: an Illinois petroleum coke maker was cited for air violations In July 2005 a coke drying plant near Chicago, Illinois was facing government action regarding alleged air pollution violations at Lemont, Ill. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency alleges that the company modified the plant, causing significant emission increases, without obtaining permits that would have required the installation of additional pollution controls. The company also allegedly failed to report the modifications in its state operating permit application and failed to comply with testing and monitoring requirements, the EPA said. The emissions that allegedly increased included volatile organic compounds, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide. Source: WasteNews.com |
|